Rising City Index · November 2026 all 1029 cities ×

Khabarovsk

Russia · 0.5 million people · =438 of 1029

Keeping pace, from a high base.

Where it stands (2020–24 data)High base

Light trendFading

Rising City Index grade BB

45.1 out of 100Based on 6 of 6 forces

What this grade says

Khabarovsk scores 45.1 out of 100 against fixed benchmarks. Strongest: transport and economy. Weakest: energy and people. It starts from a high base (2020–24 levels). Night-time light is still growing, but more slowly since 2022.

Economy66

339th of 1031 cities

Connections54

526th of 1022 cities

Energy0

859th of 1032 cities · rests on one measure

People7

927th of 1032 cities

Transport85

173rd of 948 cities

Environment59

163rd of 1032 cities · rests on one measure

The grade is the average of the six force scores, and can sit at most two bands above the city's third-weakest force. AAA and AA need all six forces scored.

How to read the table: every measure is scored from 0 to 100 against a fixed benchmark (the line under each measure), not against other cities. Adding cities never changes this score. Black bars = a score below 15.

MeasureKhabarovskScore against the benchmarkScore

Economy · 66 out of 100

Night-time light, 2015–250 = no growth · 100 = +10% a year (light ×2.6 in a decade) +121% 82

Research output, 2015–240 = no growth · 100 = output ×8 in a decade (+23.1% a year; set high because new journals entering the index inflate growth) · scored only with at least 100 works in 2015 +164% 49

Income per person, 2015–20Context, not in the grade: its period ends in the COVID year (2020) −1% –

Connections · 54 out of 100

Fixed internet speed growth, 2020–230 = no gain · 100 = +50% a year · growth counted from at least 15 Mbps +105% 54

Air passengers, 2015–25Extra fact, not in the grade: no single worldwide airport source; filled as official files arrive not reported –

Internet speed reached, 2023Context, not in the grade: a level, not a change (it counts in “where it stands”) 56 Mbps –

Energy · 0 out of 100

Sun and wind added within 100 km, 2015–250 = none · 100 = 350 W per person per decade (the world average pace 2015–25, IRENA) none added 0

Clean share of new power within 100 km, 2015–250 = all new power nearby is fossil · 100 = all of it is clean (solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, geothermal); scored where at least 100 MW was built not reported –

People · 7 out of 100

Population growth, 2015–250 = shrinking or flat · 100 = +3% a year +2% 6

Human development (region), 2015–200 = no gain · 100 = +0.008 a year · Regional figure: every city in the province shares this value. +0.003 8

Transport · 85 out of 100

Residents near public transport0 = 0% · 100 = 100% (UN target: everyone by 2030) 85% 85

Metro and rapid bus opened per million people, 2015–25Extra fact, not in the grade: no single worldwide metro source; filled as official records arrive not reported –

Environment · 59 out of 100

Land built vs people added, 2010–200 = land grows 2× faster than people · 100 = land grows at most 0.35 times as fast not reported –

Fine-particle air pollution, 2013–15 to 2021–230 = no fall · 100 = −8% a year (China's 2013–20 pace), or already at or below 5 µg/m³ (the WHO guideline) −10% 17

Greenness of built-up land, 2015–250 = −0.03 a decade (losing green) · 100 = +0.10 a decade +0.119 100

Weakest forces

energy · people

Its two lowest force scores. Strongest: transport · economy.

Sources: NASA Black Marble · EU JRC GHSL Urban Centre Database R2024A (air, greenness, sprawl, human development, internet) and GHS-POP (people within 100 km) · UN-Habitat SDG 11.2.1 · OpenAlex · Global Energy Monitor · airport operators and aviation authorities · metro and transit operators. Mostly Estimates. Every score is measured against a fixed benchmark, not against other cities. Nobody can pay for or submit data to a grade. How the grade works